Really this should be listed as a variant of X-Men (1991) #1 as it is just recolored version for 3-D. But at the minimum the publisher should be changed to “Marvel Comics” or “Marvel Comics and Pan Dimensional”
No, they should be listed separately. Different publisher with a license for reprinting older books. They’re good as is. You’re free to change it in your own database.
@CLZ_Justin See image below. Anomaly did the work. Marvel and Pan-Universal published. Pan Dimensional is the distributor. Definitely “Marvel Comics” or “Marvel Comics and Pan Dimensional” and these credits are present in all the Pan Dimensional 3D conversion books.
Not printed by Marvel and outside the US
@CLZ_Justin Marvel IS the publisher. They use a joint-venture CO-OP created by Fox called ERASMUS (the part of the picture I gave you that you conveniently clipped out) as the clearing house for joint publishing when they engage 3rd parties to do work on their titles that they don’t have expertise for in house (like 3D, silk screens, horizontal spines, etc.)
And Pan Galactic is another US corporation by the way - not foreign - that does project management and distribution.
Where a book is printed has absolutely nothing to do with publishing and MOST comic books are not printed in the US. And frankly, most publishers do not print OR distribute their own books.
So, if you don’t want to make the change and have right data that is your choice - but the fact is I gave you the correct information - don’t know why you would want to ignore it.
Thank you for providing more info. Missed the “published by” line. I still think it’s best to keep them separate as their titled one-shot in the indicia. I will however adjust the publisher to “Erasmus Fox” as this is noted in the indicia. They might be tied legal/connection-wise or printed by Marvel, Erasmus Fox is still the noted publisher.
“So, if you don’t want to make the change and have right data that is your choice - but the fact is I gave you the correct information - don’t know why you would want to ignore it.”
Bit of a weird way to reply though. Am I not allowed to miss things or overlook details? We can always come back on something right? If I were to take everything all users sent to us straight on without question, Core would be a mess.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention!