No it’s not a joke, see my comment above.
Oh, this is very sad to hear. A huge reason why I use Music Collector to begin with is because it’s a separate offline program, rather than a web-based service. Quite concerned now what this means for the offline software in the long run.
4 Likes
Very disappointing news…I will not be dependent on a web app for my music collection or any database for that matter. I pay for it now but do not use it…I primarily use the desktop and on occasion the phone app. I have to have a supported desktop app for when I must be offline for weeks at a time. Here I though I had found the perfect solution when I switched to Colletorz back in 2021. Hopefully the company leads who made this decision will reconsider this plan.
3 Likes
As I said above:
Music Collector will keep working and we will try to keep Music Collector compatible with CLZ Core and CLZ Cloud for as long as that is feasible.
Remember that the Mac editions were discontinued in Feb 2021 and are still functional today.
If it was the perfect solution in 2021… what changed now?
It is stil the same software and still functional.
As I said in other topic on this forum: just keep using Music Collector and all will be okay 
Except that enhancements, like the one I suggested to introduce a runout list, will probably not be added. Sure, Music Collector is “still functional” and might be fixed if a Windows Update negatively impacts it, but it looks like it will never be improved.
Even though several in this forum have expressed disappointment, apparently there aren’t enough of us to make it worthwhile because, as Alwin described in another thread, the investment and risk will likely be too high to improve it. 
1 Like
I have seen 4 or 5 Music Collector users expressing disappointment, certainly not a widespread sentiment.
I will admit that Music Collector is the toughest one, as some users are using it to catalog music files, using the Add by Scanning a CD tool, or are cataloging lots of track level data. Neither of which is possible in Connect.
For our other products (for games, movies, books, comics), the transition to Connect is much smaller, as the difference in features and fields is much smaller.
Can I assume that with no new updates for Music Collector I am wasting my money for the yearly subs as I,m also paying for the Mobile App. I Have tried the 7 Day free trial for Connect and I don’t like the layout as for years I’ve been using Music Collector and have gotten to like it.
1 Like
No, that is not correct. Most of the subscriptions payments are for access to the CLZ Core for adding albums, syncing with CLZ Cloud, for access to the Find Cover Online feature, for customer support (7 days a week), et.c…
I am sorry to hear that. I am sure that you would get used to it quite quickly. Also, maybe try playing around with the layout (Vertical Split, Horizontal Split) and the different views.
Which layout are you using in Music Collector?
3 panels Horizontal
Are you sure? That is a strange view to work in. I mean, with the full width folder panel wasting a lot of space:
Ah, you are using 3 panels Horizontal, but WITHOUT a folder panel.
But that layout is available in Music Connect too:
Yeah i saw that. Tell me if i transferred to music connect can i still use collector if i want and both will run together if i edit music collector?
If you just subscribe to Music Connect, sure, you can use them next to each other.
But if you accept our special Trade-In offer, for transferring your existing subscription days AND getting 4 months free… then you actually TRADE IN your Music Collector and you cannot use it anymore.
What’s changed…the elimination of support for the desktop app. I do not usee the web based Music Collector app. I only use the desktop and occassionally the iphone app too look up something in my collection. I have no interest in using a browser/internet hosted app (SAAS). I work in the tech field and advise all my clients that any application you deem critical for business ops or for its data to always have an on prem solution. I practice what I preach and for me my music collection data and ability to use offline when travelling or working from my mountain house where I have no internet and keep some of my music collection yet to be cataloged is important. As long as the app still works and so does the sync to the cloud and to the mobile app I will continue to use in the short term.
1 Like
Good point. I don’t travel anymore so a web based program has no use to me. I like saving everything to my usb sticks and my remote hard drive. I have this thing about apple and iphones where everything is in the cloud. I’m staying with music collector.
That did not change. We are still supporting the desktop software.
Okay, and how does a music cataloging program fall in that category?
You have stated that you will support it as “as long as that is feasible” and “All our development focus is now on the Music Connect web-based software and the CLZ Music mobile app. It is unlikely that there will be any more features update for the Music Collector desktop software.”
My music collection is both a key asset and a daily catalog program is essential just as my financial managment software. Bottom line, I can use them offline and have my master data locally stored.
Its clear I am not going to change your mind in regards to keeping the desktop Music Collector software updated and supported. I will just have to see how this plays out and keep alternatives in mind.
1 Like
Exactly. That means it will probably keep working for many years to come.
Some of our long-time competitors with music database desktop software for Windows:
- CDTrustee by base40.com (dead now)
- CATtraxx by fnprg.com (dead now)
- Music Label by codeaero.com (dead now)
- OrangeCD, by firetongue.com (still available, but not developed anymore)
Really, if you are coming from Music Collector, THE best alternative is our Music Connect web-based software.